Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index        Next message ==>
Sender:
Low Fatt Kin Kelvin
Date:
Sun, 27 Jul 2003 21:24:42 +0800
Re:
Defences

 

Peter Birks has a short comment on the subject in his chapter in Commercial Remedies, Burrows & Peel (eds), OUP. I don't have my copy handy so I can't point you to the exact page but it shouldn't be difficult to find.

 

Kelvin Low

-----Original Message-----

From: Paul Cott
Sent: Sun 27/07/2003 20:27
Subject: [RDG:] defences

Would be very grateful for anyones opinion on the latest learning/courts view on the debate between the change of position defence and the estoppel defence, and also whether anyone thinks the estoppel defence as it all operates "all or nothing" should be or will be discarded.

thanks
paul cott


<== Previous message       Back to index        Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !