![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
|
|
Dear Paul,
Welcome to the Restitution Discussion Group. The RDG
has always been used to foster academic discussion and to disseminate
news, but not to solicit advice on pending matters.
Best wishes,
Lionel
On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 04:57 PM, Paul Tredoux
wrote:
G'day all
Is anyone aware of any decided cases
which provide authority for the decision of the following problem:
A and B enter into an agreement of
sale in terms of which A sells and B purchases a mine for $7,000,000.00.
The entire purchase price is payable on signature of the contract.
The contract is signed on 1 September
1999, and a cheque for $2,000,000.00 is issued by B and delivered to
A as part-payment of the purchase price. A banked the cheque but same
was dishonoured and returned marked "Refer to Drawer" that same day.
The relevant legislation provides
that there is a three year limitation period in respect of the obligations
arising out of the agreement of sale, but a six-year period in respect
of the claim based on the cheque.
A took no steps to enforce the agreement,
or to claim payment on the cheque for a period of three years. After
the expiry of the three year period he institutes action on the cheque.
(Accept that A and B are immediate
parties on the cheque, and that there are accordingly no special rules
relating to negotiable instruments which prevent B from raising defences
which are relevant to the underlying equities)
Is A entitled to enforce payment on
the cheque (notwithstanding that he is no longer able to enforce the
agreement of Sale)? <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||