![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Here
is a current, real, situation involving "Change of Position";
If our bank balance is low we simply tighten our belts
and avoid making unnecessary expenditures. Over the last year we had a
false impression of how much money was in our account and so we spent
money that we would otherwise simply have avoided spending.
The insurance company has been asked for the legal basis
on which they are claiming repayment. No doubt they will claim "Unjustified
Enrichment". I would agree if they had contacted us immediately, but the
delay of a year puts things in a quite different light. Will "Change of
Position" act as a good defence?
Any other angles on defence, especially in English or
Scottish Law, would be welcome. The problem has caused distress, annoyance,
and inconvenience. Once thing that has made us unhappy is that the insurance
company was given the bank account details solely for the purpose of obtaining
Direct Debit payments, not for making deposits into the account. Is there
any claim against the insurance company for breaching the trust placed
in them when they were given the account details? Also my wife was the
insurance company's customer and it is her that they are pursuing, but
the account into which they paid the money is a joint one, can this help
frustrate the insurance company?
Regards ___________________________________________ <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |