Retraction (Kevin Kilgour, 4 Mar 2004)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Kevin Kilgour
Date:	Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:05:53
Re:	Retraction

Thank you to those who responded to my recent posting on UK preference law. Since being informed about the nature of this discussion group, I wish to retract my query and apologise for any misunderstanding - I was not aware that the group was not a public forum and not intended for student participation.

Apologies once again.

Kevin Kilgour UCL Laws

K Kilgour

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.