Unjust Enrichment in the SCC (Jason Neyers, 29 Nov 2004)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Jason Neyers
Date:	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:02:32 -0500
Re:	Unjust Enrichment in the SCC

Dear Colleagues:

For those of you who might be interested, the SCC has recently released its decision in Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City) in which the court applies the absence of basis methodology it propounded in Garland v. Consumers Gas.

Cheers,

--
Jason Neyers
January Term Director
Assistant Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.