Harris case (Brian Conroy, 27 Jul 2005)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Brian Conroy
Date:	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:04:01 +0100
Re:	Harris case

I thought people interested in Irish law might like to be informed of the recent Irish High Court decision of Gilligan J. in Harris v. Quigley and Irwin (18th March, 2005), which is an interesting application of the Woolwich decision in the context of a €9.1 million claim for a tax refund. It seems to me to be one of the most important Irish decisions on unjust enrichment.

It does not appear to have anything to do with U2 though.

Brian Conroy
Barrister-At-Law

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.