Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
A Moore
Date:
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:38:40 -0500
Re:
Knowing assistance or receipt or unjust enrichment conundrum

 

Hello Everyone,

Here's the conundrum.

Our corporation is a plaintiff in a lawsuit in Ottawa Canada.

There are three defendants in the lawsuit: an ex-director of the plaintiff Canadian Corporation, his wife and his wife's Ontario Corporation.

In 2003 the defendant director had several clients make payments out to his wife's numbered company instead of our company.

When he was caught he agreed to a settlement to repay the diverted revenue. A short time later he filed for bankruptcy along with his wife's numbered company.

The only defendant left is his wife who has all the assets in her name.

The wife was the only share holder and director of her company; she was also the only signing officer on the bank account which she opened by depositing the first of the diverted payments in April 2003. She incorporated the company in 1994 but sold the company's client list in 1997. She kept the company dormant until April 2003.

Bank records show some cancelled checks made out to the wife' s personal benefit. All of the checks were signed by the wife but often the payee was filled out by her husband.

In her defence she claims that she knows nothing of her husband's business, that she opened the bank account only to take advantage of a tax loss from 1997 that she thought would be possible on account of her obtaining a real estate license in September 2003. She denies any unjust enrichment because she claims that the company owed her money as a result of selling her the client list at a loss in 1997.

By virtue of a wealthy family she has unlimited resources for legal expenses. We on the other hand do not and after 14 months of litigation have to decide whether or not this is worth pursuing.

Any insights regarding whether there is a good chance on realising a judgement against the sole solvent defendant for either knowing assistance, knowing receipt or unjust enrichment.

 

Sincerely A. Moore


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !