The underrated undergraduate subject (Gerhard Dannemann, 30 Oct 2007)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Gerhard Dannemann
Date:	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:56:16 +0100
Re:	The underrated undergraduate subject

Is this a well kept secret, or am I the only one who has until today missed out on the fact that the Law Society and the Bar Council require all undergraduates to have been taught restitution? At least this is what their Joint Statement (p. 5) tells us.

"Obligations including Contract, Restitution and Tort" is commonly "translated" in to "Obligations I: Contract" and "Obligations II: Tort", with restitution being dropped in the process.

Funny enough, outside their joint declaration, even Bar Council and Law Society subscribe to this view.

Can anyone illuminate me on the story behind this?

Best regards,
Gerhard Dannemann

--
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannemann
Centre for British Studies
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jägerstr. 10-11
10117 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 2093 5334
Fax +49 30 2093 5370
http://www2.hu-berlin.de/gbz

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.