Restitution Discussion Group Archives
| Sender: |
Lionel Smith |
| Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:26 |
| Re: |
Cooper v PRG Powerhouse |
Thanks for this message James, which for reasons I do not fully understand, my email client tried to hide from me in an obscure mailbox.
On the final point, para 32, the judge said there was no authority either for or against consolidation of multiple bank accounts for tracing purposes. In fact there is authority both for and against: Law of Tracing, 230-1. One of the many weaknesses of that book is its index!
Lionel
-- "The firm accepted an immense cash payment from the client composed largely of $100 bills and stuffed into a shoe box or a Ritz cracker box. ... This conduct disappoints."
Wilkinson C.J. for the 4th Circuit C.A. in U.S. v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C., 83 F.3d 660 (1996) at 671, cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 788 (1997).
<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>
»
»
»
»
| For
editorial policy, see here. For the unedited archive, see here. The archive editor is Steve Hedley. |
