Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Look C Ho
Date:
Wed, 13 Oct 1999 12:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Re:
Cheque-kiting

 

S.1-103 of UCC provides that 'unless displaced by the particular provisions of this Act, the principles of law and equity shall supplement its provisions'.

I guess the common-law banker's lien would have been displaced by S.4-210 which provides that 'a collecting bank has a security interest in an item and any accompanying documents or the proceeds of either: (1) in case of an item deposited in an account, to the extent to which credit given for the item has been withdrawn or applied.'

On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Gordon Goldberg wrote:

I do not know the terms of the Uniform Commercial Code nor how far they exclude the common law. I, therefore, wonder whether or not Misa v. Currie (1876) 1 App. Cas. 554, insofar as it deals with the banker's lien, might be relevant.

 

L


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !