![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
I agree that the Blake full profit measure should be
exceptional. As I have suggested before I think it should be available
only where the claimant will suffer significant uncompensable harm if
the defendant does not perform the contract. This accounts for disclosure
of information cases including government secrets and also generally negative
obligations, because here generally the claimant cannot get substitute
performance from someone else. It also accounts for fiduciary cases, but
I would not say that the availability of the full profit measure is dependent
on the contract's being "close to fiduciary", because there are cases
where this test is satisfied that are clearly not fiduciary because there
is no discretion involved.
I also agree that the full profit measure should be kept
quite distinct from the "reasonable payment" measure. The two are based
on quite different principles. A few years ago I used the expressions
"disgorgement damages" and "restitutionary damages" to distinguish between
them. Disgorgement is based on the principle that a wrongdoer should not
profit from a wrong, so the question in contract is when it is really
wrongful not to perform a contract, and I think this is where uncompensable
harm will result. In the original trespass cases and the IP cases the
basis of the "restitutionary damages" claim seems to me to be simply the
right of an owner to the "use-value" of the property, by virtue of which
he can exact a reasonable payment for use. But this cannot be applied
straightforwardly to contract. Possibly it would apply where the very
purpose of a contractual restriction was to enable a fee to be subsequently
exacted in return for waiving the restriction, giving the claimant a right
to some part of the value of the restricted activity. This is the case
in some but not all restrictive covenant cases and possibly it could be
relevant in Hendrix.
Peter.
Prof Peter Jaffey Tel: 01895 274000 <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |