Presumption of Advancement (Jason Neyers, 15 May 2007)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Jason Neyers
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2007 14:47:31 -0400
Re:	Presumption of Advancement

Dear Colleagues:

According to The Lawyer's Weekly the Supreme Court of Canada has abolished the presumption of advancement for transfers between parents and adult children (even disabled adult children) in two recent cases. See Madsen Estate v. Saylor, 2007 SCC 18 (May 3, 2007) and Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17 (May 3, 2007).

Happy Reading,

--
Jason Neyers
January Term Director
Associate Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.