Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22 (Michael Rush, 24 May 2007)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Michael Rush
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 03:43:09 +0100
Re:	Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22

The High Court's decision in Farah Constructions v Say-Dee was handed down this morning.

Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Callinan, Heydon and Crennan J upheld the appeal and, in so doing, poured considerable scorn on the decision of the NSW Court of Appeal and any argument that a claim in knowing receipt is based on restitutionary principles.

Michael

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.