Structure and Justification in Private Law (Gerhard Dannemann, 18 Apr 2008)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Gerhard Dannemann
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:23
Re:	Structure and Justification in Private Law

Not unless Eric Descheemaeker has discovered any mistake (or is it absence of basis?) in his list of Peter's publications.

Francis Rose wrote:
Does this mean that everything in the first tribute must now be called back and burnt?

--
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannemann
Centre for British Studies
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Mohrenstr. 60
10117 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 2093 5334
Fax +49 30 2093 5370
http://www2.hu-berlin.de/gbz

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.