Structure and Justification in Private Law (Eric Descheemaeker, 18 Apr 2008)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Eric Descheemaeker
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:50
Re:	Structure and Justification in Private Law

I did, actually! A couple of typos, and I had missed a letter in the Times in 1993 ... All duly corrected in the new book. Whether this is a sufficient vitiating factor to justify burning the first one, I'll leave it to you to decide.

If any members know of obscure (or not so obscure) pieces by Peter I might have missed in the list, kindly let me know.

Eric

--
Eric Descheemaeker
St Catherine's College Oxford

----- Original Message -----
From: Gerhard Dannemann
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [RDG] Structure and Justification in Private Law
Not unless Eric Descheemaeker has discovered any mistake (or is it absence of basis?) in his list of Peter's publications.

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.